|
Objective 2.1 Effective mechanisms that manage and support accountable humanitarian coordination leaders. |
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of inter-cluster, cluster and cross-cutting recommendations issued by HCT that are implemented at operational level.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
HCT recommendations implemented at the operational level were not tracked in 2011. To improve reporting on the workplan, the OCHA office is developing a comprehensive monitoring system for 2012.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Established and functioning operational inter-cluster forums at field and capital level in accordance with generic TOR.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Established and functioning ICCM at provincial level, Humanitarian Response Team in KPK and HCT at national level, based on generic ToRs.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Thirty per cent of agenda issues addressed by strategic-level HCT that are submitted from operational-level inter-cluster coordination forums.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Seventy per cent. Results were not always as envisaged due to factors beyond OCHA’s control.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of provincial- and district-level actions completed on time in accordance with action-tracking matrix.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
This indicator was not tracked in 2011.
|
|
INDICATOR |
HC compact endorsed by HC by December 2011.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Compact endorsed
|
|
Objective 2.2 An OCHA capable of responding quickly with clear triggers for establishing, phasing and drawing down operations. |
|
INDICATOR |
Country Office Strategy developed, including planning indicators in consultation with partners.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Strategy completed with significant inputs from partners and donors.
|
|
Objective 2.3 A more predictable and scalable suite of OCHA services and tools to support leaders and partners in response preparedness, humanitarian response and transition. |
|
INDICATOR |
Number of reports on humanitarian access with documentation on actions taken.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Three reports were issued in 2011, but reporting quality was affected by limited partner inputs.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of HCT members, donors and other key stakeholders reporting improved understanding of access issues.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
OCHA Pakistan focused on sensitizing humanitarian partners on access issues and improving reporting on access constraints.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of key OCHA tools using sex- and age-disaggregated data.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
The use of SADD was promoted and implemented in the Rapid Response Plan, sit reps and the 4W (Who, What, Where, When) matrix (100 per cent).
|
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of partners providing sex-disaggregated data in reporting.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Five out of seven clusters (WASH, shelter, food security, health and protection) provide SADD (71 per cent).
|
|
Objective 2.4 A more systematic humanitarian programme cycle (needs assessment and analysis, joint planning, fund-raising and resource allocation, and monitoring and evaluation). |
|
INDICATOR |
Needs-assessment plan developed and endorsed by HCT.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Plans developed for three joint needs assessments that were undertaken under the leadership of the Assessment Working Group co-chaired by OCHA and the Government.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of districts and percentage of clusters completing assessments on a quarterly basis.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Twenty-five per cent. Regular nutrition and shelter assessments conducted.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of projects in the funding mechanism (CAP, CERF and ERF) coded with the Gender Marker.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Rapid Response Plan 2011: 90 per cent of the (93) projects were reviewed with gender lens and assigned a gender score out of which over one third (31 per cent) were designed in a manner to address the needs and benefit women, men, girls and boys.
Early Recovery Framework 2012: 61 per cent projects had a significant potential to contribute towards addressing the needs and benefit all population groups.
Emergency Response Fund: 90 per cent applied gender marker with almost 52 per cent having the potential to advance gender equality significantly and 41 per cent contributing towards gender in a limited manner. |
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of total projects submitted prioritized as “high” in compliance with HCT-endorsed methodology. Percentage of projects prioritized in accordance with agreed criteria.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
Half of the projects were prioritized as “high”, with all projects assessed along agreed methodology.
|
|
INDICATOR |
Percentage of clusters using common operational datasets for systematic information collation, analysis and decision-making in KPK.
|
|
ACHIEVEMENTS |
100 per cent. Eight clusters in KPK using a common database for displaced people for data reporting, analysis and decision-making.
|